ATTENTION WRITERS: A Service For Every Budget

Writer’s Relief helps writers of every budget prepare and target their submissions to agents and editors. Here’s how we can help YOU:

FREE: Our Writers’ Newsflash—Sent via e-mail once a month. No purchase required, EVER. Hot leads, contests, tips, and techniques to get you published.

$100: A La Carte Service—We will target your work to the 25+ best markets for your specific topic, style, and writing goals.

$200 - $250: A La Carte PLUS Service—Just like A La Carte, but with 25+ cover or query letters. We will compose, proofread, address, and print all your letters. Save tons of time!

$339 - $399 (per cycle): Full Service—We rescue you from ALL the tedious submission legwork—preparing, proofreading, formatting, targeting, and tracking your submissions. All you have to do is write! Our BEST service with our HIGHEST ACCEPTANCE RATE. By Review Board, invitation only.

Newsflash Number 31

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:45 by Writer's Relief Staff

HOT OFF THE PRESS! We love to share our information with writers, and we’re happy to pass some of our INSIDER’S SECRETS along to you. Feel free to print these posts to use as a reference. Pass the links along to your writer friends. It’s packed with great information this month. DEADLINE-DATED lists of anthologies, theme issues, and contests are included at no charge!

In This Issue:

* * Should you or should you not? PEN NAMES may answer the question.

* * Stymied by pesky punctuation marks? We'll teach you to PUNCTUATE QUOTED MATERIAL.

* * Do you want to get your submissions in the mail by next week? Our A LA CARTE SERVICE is quick, easy, and affordable. Read more here: http://www.WritersReliefBlog.com/post/Our-A-La-Carte-Service.aspx.

* * THIS WRITING PROMPT may help you find the place of your dreams.

* * LOTS OF HELP for CHILDREN’S BOOK AUTHORS—100 CONTACTS and Everything You Need To Know To Submit Your Children’s Book. Click this link to get our insider's tips and tricks: http://www.WritersReliefBlog.com/post/For-Childrens-Book-Authors.aspx.

* * We’re giving away a FREE REPORT that outlines industry-standard Manuscript FORMAT Guidelines when you order our E-book entitled REJOICE IN REJECTION. Go to: http://www.WritersReliefBlog.com/post/Rejoice-in-Rejection-e-book.aspx.

* * CELEBRATING THE SEMICOLON IN A MOST UNLIKELY LOCATION! (You won't believe where!)

* * What the heck is a SNIGLET?

* * You won’t find a better list anywhere (AND IT’S FREE!) of upcoming ANTHOLOGIES, SPECIAL-THEMED JOURNALS, and CONTESTS. Visit: http://WritersReliefBlog.com/post/Anthologies-Contests.aspx

Scroll Down to Read These Exciting and Useful Articles!!

Pen Names

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:42 by Writer's Relief Staff

Using a false name to claim authorship of a work sounds kind of shady, but it's a legitimate and common practice. Actors and artists often use fictitious names, and writers sometimes choose to create under a different persona as well. There are several reasons to use pseudonyms ("pen names" in the literary community), and there are reasons not to.

Writing under a fictitious name was a very common practice in the eighteenth century, when writers and journalists used pseudonyms to pen controversial or even illegal articles and letters to the editor. Ben Franklin used this practice extensively, and when he used a pen name, he often created an entire character to go along with it. Dean Koontz and Stephen King, both prolific writers, used pen names at the suggestion of their publishers to avoid overexposure. And George Eliot was actually Mary Ann Evans, who used a male pen name in order to be taken seriously in a male-dominated society.

These days we enjoy more freedom of expression than ever before, and writing under a pen name is more a choice than necessity. If you're a beginning writer, making the decision to use a pen name is probably not top priority for you, unless you fall under one of the categories below. Your job is to focus on your work, not your name; and you want to get exposure, not hide your true identity. As you begin to build up writing credits, think of yourself as a product. Unless your "brand name" truly does not reflect what you want the world to see, there's no good reason to protect your identity—unless, of course, you're writing an exposé on the mob. Or you're Salman Rushdie.

There are several reasons why writers choose to adopt pen names.

Another author "owns" your name. Your mother was a big fan, and your name is Sylvia Plath.

Your name doesn't fit the genre. Bruiser Ratchet or Belinda Blood may want to choose more romantic names to break into the romance genre. (However, Bruiser Ratchet would be a great name for a detective/suspense novel writer, and Ms. Blood's name suits the horror genre to a tee.)

You want to conceal your real identity. You're a prim and proper physics professor at a large university but write erotica on the side—under an assumed name, of course. A pen name would also protect the author from political persecution (again, think Salman Rushdie) or prejudice. Imagine writing about homosexuality or even atheism from a personal perspective in the 1950s without using a pen name.

Your name is too "ethnic" or too hard to pronounce and/or spell. If your name contains ten syllables and several Xs and Zs, perhaps a shorter, easier-to-spell name would be in order. And if it can be pronounced correctly by the average Joe, that would be good. Remember: easy to say, easy to spell, easy to remember.

You've been burdened with a truly bad name to begin with. Consider Adolf Mussolini. Ima Hogg. Harold Bahls. Mercedes Binns. Tanya Hyde. Rachel Inequality. You get the picture.

You want to cross genres. Anne Rice, famous for her vampire series, uses pen names for her collections of erotica, and she would probably take up a new one if she wanted to move into Christian writing or Westerns.

You've been published before, and sales were not good. In this case, your publisher may suggest a pen name to help boost sales of your new book (and break the association with the poorly received book).

OTHER ISSUES

The minute you decide to take on a nom de plume, be prepared to stick to that name in your correspondence and at writers' conferences and book signings. You want people to associate that name with you, not give them a slew of different names to remember.

Hint: If you do choose to go with a pen name, choose a name that's not too generic or linked to someone else. Try an online search of your prospective name to see what comes up. You don't want your readers to confuse you with the famous foot fungus specialist of the same name.

When sending queries to editors or agents, use the name you want to publish under for the byline and use your real name in the information block. If you've been published frequently under another name, make reference to it in your query ("I've been published previously under the name ABC, but in my foray into Genre #2, I've decided to use the name XYZ"). In the submission process, you don't want to confuse the editor or agent by using multiple names.

When you are ready to sign a contract, make sure your editor and agent know your real name and its correct spelling; your contract should include a space for both names as well. Also be sure that your bank and local post office are aware of all your personas, or you may have trouble cashing checks.

When filing for copyright protection, use your real name for "Copyright Claimant" and your pen name for "Name of Author." If you do not want your legal name associated with the pen name, enter only the pen name under "Name of Author" and identify it as such (Lucy Lickumchuck writing as Lucy Smith). Use your pen name for "Copyright Claimant" as well. However, if your copyright is held only under your pen name, you can run into legal disputes about copyright ownership—consult with an attorney.

Want to know more about the legal ramifications of pen names? Read Pen Names II.

Planning to use a pen name to guard your identity for nonfiction? Read Creative Nonfiction: How To Stay Out Of Trouble.

  

Punctuation and Quoted Material

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:39 by Writer's Relief Staff

Stymied by pesky punctuation marks and their position in quoted speech or phrases? The rules differ depending on what part of the world you hail from, but if you're writing for an American audience, here's the skinny.

Commas and periods go inside quotation marks:

She said, "Put the groceries over there."

It's no wonder that we still rely on romantic "instinct."

Except when a parenthetical reference follows the quotation:

Fritzheimer refers to this option as "a quick fix with little regard for the individual's needs" (321).

Colons and semicolons go outside quotation marks:

The first group's questionnaires came back with a majority of "not sure" or "not at this time"; however, the second group responded more in the affirmative.

Be sure to pack enough road trip "survival gear": magazines, munchies, and gum.

Question marks and exclamation points go outside the quotation if they apply to the whole sentence, inside if they apply to the quotation itself:

George asked, "Why is he yelling at the coach?"

Why do they insist on saying, "All's well that ends well"?

Susan yelled, "She's driving on the wrong side of the road!"

I cannot believe she is singing "The Star-Spangled Banner"!

A comma is not needed if the quoted material flows smoothly within the sentence, without break or pause:

The phrase "live and let live" always comes to mind when the neighbors pay a visit.

British Versus American Style

In the UK and British-influenced countries, commas and periods are placed either inside or outside the closing quotation marks based on whether or not they belong to the quoted material (much the same way as American placement of question marks and exclamation points is determined). So why did we change styles in the United States? Surprisingly, it was more a matter of typography than grammar or style. According to alt.english.usage, back in the 1700s American printers, when setting type by hand, found that periods or commas outside of quotation marks were prone to get knocked out of position or were damaged because they were smaller and more delicate. If they were inside the quotation mark, they were better protected, and thus we began to move away from British convention.

Some American language experts are outspoken advocates of returning to the British style, citing the confusion that can result from our system. But The Chicago Manual of Style says, "In defense of nearly a century and a half of the American style, it may be said that it seems to have been working fairly well and has not resulted in serious miscommunication."

Writing Prompt—Home

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:36 by Writer's Relief Staff

HOME . . . what does it mean to you? If you've been out apartment or house hunting, you probably have a list (next time remember to ask the universe for more closet space)! Write about what you want your home to be. Don't worry about grammar, punctuation, or making any real sense. The sky's the limit. Would you like a loft in SoHo? Or a log cabin far away from the maddening crowd? Home is where the heart is, isn't it?

Celebrating the Semicolon in a Most Unlikely Location

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:33 by Writer's Relief Staff

Read this article by Sam Roberts.

Semicolon sightings in the city are unusual, but Neil Neches, a writer in the transit agency's marketing and service information department, inserted one on a placard anyway.

This article articulates the wonder in seeing a semicolon in such an odd place, but other grammarians, professors, and teachers are delighted to see it used properly.

The reason the semicolon is so rarely seen and used is simply because not many know how to use it properly. In the wave of technology and IM/text speak, a semicolon is used to wink at someone.

Check out the article for more information. ;)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/nyregion/18semicolon.html?ex=1361163600&en=1f4b96ff6a13e0b6&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

Sniglet

Thursday, 19 June 2008 10:30 by Writer's Relief Staff

What the heck is a sniglet? According to comedian Rich Hall, who coined the phrase in the 1980s HBO series, Not Necessarily the News, a sniglet is "any word that doesn't appear in the dictionary, but should." Obviously, this is not a new concept. People have been making up their own words since the days of woolly mammoths. But Mr. Hall is the man who came up with a name for these neologisms, and that seems to be a specialty of his. His keen insight into American culture, a fascination with the English language, and a dry wit led him to publish five collections of sniglets—his own, as well as submissions from his fans.

So, for instance, if you're looking for a term to describe the affliction of dialing a phone number and forgetting who you were calling just as they answer, Hall has created a word especially for you: phonesia. He also came up with the very useful "carperpetuation," which finally gives us a way to describe the act of running the vacuum over a string or piece of lint dozens of times, reaching over to pick it up, examining it, and then putting it back down to give the vacuum one last chance. It's about time someone came up with a term for that scenario.

Even Oprah Winfrey's gotten into the act with slumpadinka (a woman who dresses like she's given up on herself, and it shows). So it's only logical that, as writers, we should have our own set of sniglets. For example:                                                           

Barfiage—the act of effortlessly "spewing" the perfect poem, short story, or chapter in one writing session. (The act of effortlessly spewing a fabulous poem, short story, or chapter that needs absolutely no revision is called a "miracle.")

Blockberry—the slightly scary assistant who stands between you and your editor/agent every time you call

Criticut—a member of a writers' group who scribbles a single derogatory word across the front page of your work (DRIVEL!) but offers no other comment whatsoever

Chickencrit—a member of a writers' group who offers plenty of criticism and advice, yet never, ever offers up their own work for scrutiny

Embarrasqueak—the excited noise one makes when the answer to a perplexing plot question (for example) strikes at an inappropriate time, such as in the middle of a staff meeting or at a funeral for the kids' hamster

Embarrastare—the blank stare on a writer's face when lost in thought, again at inopportune and embarrassing moments

Frusta-freeze—an inexplicably frozen computer screen (and the inexplicable error message that follows)

Keybored—the act of aimlessly surfing the Web when you should be working

Queternity—the amount of time that elapses between sending out a query and hearing something back

Repeat-a-cut—a paper cut that keeps getting reopened

Wikiholica—person with a tragic addiction to Wikipedia

Zoomilocation—A future Olympic event, zoomilocation describes the act of zipping around your office on a chair with wheels

And there's an actual term that describes that elusive word just on the tip of your tongue—you know, the word so elusive that nothing remotely similar comes to mind, so even your thesaurus can't help you?

And, finally, one more. Rich Hall is to thank for this one: Sarchasm—the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it. (May we suggest sarcastrophe, as in "The humor of this piece fell flat, which was an unfortunate sarcastrophe"?)

Writers worldwide should be quite happy with this treasure trove of new material. No longer will we have to rack our brains for just the right phrase to describe two people wrestling for the same armrest at the movie theater (elbonics), or that smudgy, slimy nose print dogs leave on the windows (pupkus). Thank you, Rich Hall. Thank you for enriching our vocabulary and expanding our repertoire of yet more words to learn how to spell.

REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT OUR LIST OF WRITING CONTESTS and ANTHOLOGIES! You won’t find a better list anywhere (AND IT’S FREE!) of upcoming anthologies, special-themed journals, and contests. Find it by visiting:
http://www.writersreliefblog.com/post/Anthologies-Contests.aspx